GAY
AND LESBIAN FAMILIES
Articles and Analysis
Marriage – A Dream
Open to Everyone
By Richard J. Rosendall
LEF Contributing Writer
We recently crossed a major
demarcation line in the history of the gay rights
movement. On May 17, 2004, gay marriages in America
became a legal reality (if only in Massachusetts
at first), not just a private commitment or an
act of civil disobedience. To be sure, the fight
will continue in courts and legislatures for many
years, but that does not diminish the magnitude
of this moment. The long struggle between gay
liberation and integration has essentially been
decided, and integration has won.
The conservative nature of
this development has not been lost on the liberationists.
Their anti-assimilationism is rapidly becoming
obsolete, as gay couples across the country demand
full inclusion in the central institution of our
society.
As with all Lost Causes, some
diehards resist recognizing their defeat. In an
August 2003 article for the Boston Phoenix decrying
the "marriage
rights mania" Michael Bronski dismisses
marriage rights as "crumbs." The social
benefits of marriage aside, few would regard the
1,138 rights and privileges associated with marriage
under federal law, or the additional hundreds
under state laws, as mere crumbs.
Bronski treats marriage as
if it hasn't changed in fifty years. In fact,
legalized contraception and abortion, no-fault
divorce, and the rise of marriage as an equal
partnership have left the institution far different
from the oppressive patriarchal tool he portrays.
His grim portrait, including his unsubstantiated
claim of an "ongoing epidemic of domestic
violence among straight and gay couples,"
reads more like Peter Pan appealing to Wendy to
stay in Never Never Land than a serious discussion
of real families.
To hear some gay radicals tell
it, this wedding season sounds more like a funeral.
By adopting the strictures of marriage, so their
thinking goes, our community will give up its
freedom and lose its fabulousness. Many such qualms
are reported by Michael Powell in a March 31,
2004 article in The Washington Post.
These lamentations remind me
of the Lena Wertmuller film "Swept Away,"
in which a desert island is the only place where
love can flower for the socially mismatched protagonists.
Once they are rescued, their love is doomed. While
I honor our movement's pioneers, I do not share
this romantic view of our historic social isolation.
Just as with the demise of the old Chitlin Circuit,
which nurtured many great black performers before
mainstream venues were desegregated four decades
ago, few will reject the new freedom because it
brings challenges along with opportunities.
For years, when faced with
gay opponents of marriage, I have argued that
their personal aversion was one thing, and opposing
my right to choose for myself was quite another.
Ten years ago, when I tried to persuade a gay-friendly
D.C. mayoral candidate to endorse equal marriage
rights, she pointed out that the gay community
itself was divided on the issue. Indeed, Evan
Wolfson, one of the earliest and staunchest gay
marriage advocates, was often subjected to blistering
verbal abuse by gay people who resented his rocking
the boat for something they didn't even want.
The climate has now irrevocably
changed. There is no longer any serious division
in our community on the question of civil marriage
rights. From coast to coast and across the political
spectrum, we were thrilled by the rush of city
hall weddings set off by San Francisco Mayor Gavin
Newsom in February. The allure of alienation is
melting away amid the joyous nuptials; the politics
of victimhood is losing its grip even amid the
anti-gay backlash; and gay families are adjusting
their expectations upward. There is a growing
recognition that, while the victory is far from
won, the tide of history is with us.
It is only natural that such
a change would take some adjusting. I can understand
the nostalgia that some feel for the early years
after Stonewall, when life at the margins of society
brought with it a certain freedom. During the
gay community's first "out" years, the
lack of institutional signposts provided endless
opportunities for creativity. But that was the
freedom of people roaming uncharted territory.
Thirty years ago, the bar scene was one of the
few social options. There were no gay choruses,
no gay film festivals, no gay chambers of commerce.
The idea of openly gay politicians was outlandish
even in the most liberal cities. Other than a
few classical allusions, gay literature mostly
consisted of lurid paperbacks and a magazine that
was kept behind the counter at the newsstand.
Today, the number and variety
of gay organizations and services is vastly greater.
Whatever your interest or need, you're a quick
Google search away from finding someone to share
it or fill it. The truth is that we are infinitely
more free than we were in the "good old days,"
simply by having more choices.
Twenty years ago, playwright
Harvey Fierstein talked about the "perpetual
adolescence" of the urban gay milieu, in
which sowing one's wild oats became for many a
lifetime occupation. The tragedy of AIDS forced
our community to grow up, leaving us stronger
and more responsible. Marriage is the next step
-- not just for particular couples as a legal
option, but for our community as a social norm
and aspiration.
Marriage isn't for everyone,
of course. This is as true for gay people as for
heterosexuals. But simply by becoming a realistic
goal and part of the social landscape in which
gay children grow up, it will give them the freedom
to color with all the crayons in the box, as gay
children before them never could. Imagine being
a child again, and being able to blurt out your
foolish dreams unselfconsciously, the same as
your siblings and playmates. Imagine receiving
encouragement for those dreams, and taking that
encouragement for granted. Imagine the wondrous
ways a child may grow if properly nurtured. That's
a radical enough vision for me, and making it
come true will be pretty fabulous.
Richard J. Rosendall
is a writer and activist whose work has appeared
in Salon www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2004/03/02/gay_marriage
and the Independent Gay Forum www.indegayforum.com/authors/rosendall
back to top
| Back
to main articles and analysis
|